DAVID CHESKY: Urban Concertos = Concerto for Piano and Orchestra; Concerto for Orchestra; Concerto for Bassoon – Martin Kuuskmann, bassoon/ Love Derwinger, piano/ The Symphony Orchestra of the Norrlands Opera/ Rossen Gergov – Chesky Records

by | Feb 24, 2007 | SACD & Other Hi-Res Reviews | 0 comments

DAVID CHESKY: Urban Concertos =  Concerto for Piano and Orchestra; Concerto for Orchestra; Concerto for Bassoon – Martin Kuuskmann, bassoon/ Love Derwinger, piano/ The Symphony Orchestra of the Norrlands Opera/ Rossen Gergov – Chesky Records Multichannel SACD 326, 69:00 ***1/2:

David as Good Guy: David Chesky has released a new album, titled Urban Concertos, that is very good music, well-played, and well-recorded.  I know David from the NY shows where (every few years) we hold friendly debates over healthy sandwiches and green tea concerning the relative merit of recent compositions in the contemporary classical music scene, and share information on audio gear.  He’s a good guy, a pioneer in recording technique, a champion of new music and new musicians, and a fine musician, himself.  I’d like to think my opinions have some weight with him, but they probably don’t. 

During the last year and a half (maybe two years) David’s written a Concerto for Flute, a Violin Concerto, a concert piece for female voice and orchestra that lasts about 12 minutes, a Bassoon Concerto, a Piano Concerto, and a Concerto for Orchestra, all the while simultaneously running the Chesky record label with his brother Norman, and tending to some other business ventures for radio broadcasting.  If the term hadn’t been used before, I’d say this period has been Chesky’s annus mirabilis, or “year of miracles.”  Many composers would have been happy to have written one or two strong pieces in the time he’s written six.  My Borsalino “newsboy’s cap” is off to him.  Good job, David.

Authorial Intent: Chesky’s Concerto for Orchestra begins with a giant chord.  I asked David some standard questions about this piece.  He answered with this email:

“The quote from ‘Jingle Bells’ is a mockery of minimalism.  The concerto starts out with the ‘death of 12 tone music’ with the big chord, and then the ‘death of minimalism’ with the phrase from ‘Jingle Bells,’ and the kazoo comment.  Why???  Because I think this is a moronic type of music to MY sensibility.  Maybe for others it is genius, but not to my aesthetics.  Then starts the real concerto, introducing a new school of composition called ‘Urban.’  – David”

A Little Bartok?
  The piece tips its hat to Bartok, nearly (but not quite) quoting a passage in Bartok’s Concerto for Orchestra, and then taking it to places in the Chesky orchestral landscape.  In one set of variations, the Concerto’s first Movement swivels between Bartok-like and Stravinsky-like figures, and how Chesky can use them in a way that goes farther than either Bartok or Stravinsky did on their own; and then swivels back to “in a one-horse open sleigh” in the horns and takes it through some changes that few musical folks could have foreseen.  And on and on, sometimes playfully, other times with a kind of fury David can sometimes muster, and still other times with quiet quality that might be called “hushed.”  Chesky is anything but slavishly quoting his teachers in a blindly servile manner: rather, he is taking some of their most famous licks and turning them to his own use, as if saying, “Look what I can do with these guys’ stuff.”

A Little Stravinsky?  In Chesky’s Concerto for Bassoon and Orchestra he takes a well known bassoon cry, from Stravinsky’s The Rite Of Spring, and develops his whole first movement around it. (I can’t help it if I see dinosaurs from Disney’s Fantasia inside my head.  But I do.)  The second slow movement has another very ‘hushed’ opening.  Then the bassoon re-enters, less frenetic and more melancholy than in the first, jazz-like, movement.  Here is what another email says about this one:

“Take one concerto … give it a few spins … take two aspirins and get back to me.  Let’s start with the Bassoon concerto.  First movement – think of  far out bebop.  Second [movement] is very romantic.  Third is funky with Flamenco.  My stuff  is not that [far] out.  It is really grounded in NYC and jazz.  You have to listen to it a few times and it will make perfect sense.  I was born who I was, and that’s it!  I wish I could write a rap song or a Broadway show tune … but that’s not me.  You guys will just have to catch up.” — DC.

A Little Put-On?  Sometimes the composer and the critic don’t think of the music in the same language.  I mean we are both writing in English, but we use the language differently.  It might turn out that after long discussion and analysis, we would agree that given the apparent differences (owing to only a few terms) we are closer than it appears.  David is nothing if not a hipster, with all that entails, including “putting on” the squares.  Putting someone on is beyond being ironic.  This is aimed at making the other person feel foolish.  I never know when David is being ironic (doesn’t mean exactly what he says), or isn’t (he means more or less what he says), or he is putting me on (means for me to feel foolish).  I have only the words on the cathode ray tube to guide me.  As do you.

For example, does David think because he claims to have killed twelve-tone and minimalism that they will stay dead?  I think twelve tone and minimalism are pretty hearty and it would take more than one shot of Raid weed killer to do it.  The twelve-tone system is over 60 years old, now.  And minimalism is around thirty.  So when he says he has written “the death of twelve tone” and “the death of minimalism,” is David serious, or is he having a joke at the expense of twelve-tone, minimalism, and anyone uncritical enough to accept David’s explanation, that cheeky trickster.  If he means it as a joke, that’s one thing; if we are to take him seriously and he means it as a manifesto, that’s another.  You decide. [Maybe he just means he’s killed ’em off in his own music – not in general…Ed.]

I guess I’m a coward, because I haven’t got the courage to try to sort all that out.  I think it would take a long time, and in the end it wouldn’t matter much.  We have his music.  Some of the riffs in the Bassoon Concerto are a bit like John Coltrane’s riffs on soprano saxophone.  Are we to infer that David’s music is grounded in jazz?  Maybe having points in identity is not enough.  We would have to have a great many points in identity to make it jazz.  Based on jazz standard?  No. Based on Bartok and Stravinsky.  Using a lot of jazz phrases?  No.  Using more of the language of academic music.  Using rhythmic variations?  No.  Using more Flamenco rhythms, but not moving in and out of different rhythms, and not using the standard 4/4 of jazz.  So, if David says he is grounded in jazz, does that make his bassoon concerto a jazz composition?  No, especially if there is no space reserved for improvisation by the soloist, at least one cadenza.  Even if David believes what he says, does that make it so?  Not necessarily.  Especially as we don’t use the language in the same way.  When I listen to John Coltrane’s quartet play a standard song, and never quote it directly, but play it so suggestively that I “hear the lyric in my head,” well that’s one kind of jazz I like a lot.  Does Chesky employ this technique?  A bit, I must concede.

The Skinny:  Leaving the jazz element out of this discussion, I guess I can say that Chesky’s Concerto for Orchestra and his Concerto for Bassoon and Orchestra are grounded in Bartok and Stravinsky. They use the symphony orchestra much in the way other contemporary classical music does, they owe some small part of their technique to jazz, and Chesky’s way with this music is original and interesting.  The Concerto for Piano and Orchestra is for some reason less successful for me.  It may be the piano’s percussive nature that I find too staccato and jarring, too much clashing and banging for my taste.  Maybe he has to show us that he can take on Bartok as an enfant terrible and beat him at his own game.  Even in the hushed “slow movement” there is little besides busy work, at a slower tempo, and at a lower volume.  In his flute and violin concerti, Chesky was able to create a really nice ambiance in each of the slow movements.  In the piano concerto he chooses not to.  I wish he hadn’t made that choice.  Still, two out of three …

To sum up, David Chesky has written and recorded a new album of three concertos – one each for piano, bassoon, and orchestra.  The piano concerto is difficult for me to wax enthusiastic about.  The idea of using the whole orchestra as an instrument for which to write a concerto was first executed by Bartok.  Chesky’s concerto is very nicely written with much nodding to Bartok, who wrote the definitive modern Concerto for Orchestra.  If you like the Bartok, you’ll find the Chesky concerto very interesting.  The Concerto for Bassoon is something you might like if you like Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring.  Here Chesky does a handful of variations on the bassoon call in the Rite, and you can hear the point of disembarkation that develops into a set of variations in Chesky’s idiom, that he builds into a complete concerto.  This is sometimes aggressive, sometimes yearning, other times humorous and clever.  Both concertos are very much “music about music.”  That is their strength and weakness.  When they succeed, they shine a bright light into the murky corners of the forms, and (don’t get me wrong) they succeed more than they don’t.  All in all in my spreadsheet, with his Area 31 album and his Urban Concertos album taken together, Chesky bats 5 for 6, that’s five hits in six at-bats.  Hey, if two out of three ain’t bad, five out of six (.830) is freakin’ dynamite.  In a year and a half.  Great job.

The Recording: 
This music is not for everyone.  It is pretty high-brow.  What if you don’t know Bartok and Stravinsky?  What if you like “Jingle Bells?”  Well, then you might enjoy this album because it is a nearly perfect recording.  The balance is great, while the clarity, detail, and low level resolution are peerless.  It is a showcase CD, in stereo CD, SACD, or SACD Surround Sound. And if you have it around the house, you will learn what Chesky is all about.  “Hat’s off” to Nicholas Prout, who honchoed this recording along as chief recording engineer.  “Good job” to all those who arranged the dates at the Concert Hall of the Norrlands Opera in Umeå, Sweden.  “Good job,” to all the musicians in The Symphony Orchestra of the Norrlands Opera, and to Rossen Gergov who provided very tasteful and intelligent accompaniment.  “Good thinking” to those producers who chose the hall.  It is in their judgment, and mine, an outstanding acoustical venue.  I hope to hear more music recorded there.  This is really a disc of music for the connoisseur.  No hip, with-it household should be without it.

— Max Dudious



Related Reviews
La Clave – Acoustic Sounds

La Clave – Acoustic Sounds

Verve/Universal Music Group releases a re-mastered vinyl of an obscure, but highly entertaining 70’s album. 

Logo Pure Pleasure
Logo Apollo's Fire
Logo Crystal Records Sidebar 300 ms
Logo Jazz Detective Deep Digs Animated 01
La Clave – Acoustic Sounds

La Clave – Acoustic Sounds

Verve/Universal Music Group releases a re-mastered vinyl of an obscure, but highly entertaining 70’s album.