HENRY PURCELL: Twelve Sonatas in 3 Parts – Retrospect Trio – Linn ALESSANDRO SCARLATTI: Concerti Grossi – Mauro Valli, cello/ Accademia Bizantina/ Ottavio Dantone – ARTS

by | Dec 7, 2011 | SACD & Other Hi-Res Reviews

HENRY PURCELL: Twelve Sonatas in Three Parts – Retrospect Trio – Linn Records multichannel SACD CKD 374, 74:45 *****: 
ALESSANDRO SCARLATTI: Concerto Grosso No. 1 in F Minor; Concerto Grosso No. 2 in C Minor; Concerto Grosso No. 3 in F Major; Concerto Grosso No. 4 in G Minor; Concerto Grosso No. 5 in D Minor; Concerto Grosso No. 6 in E Major; Cello Sonata No. 1 in D Minor; Cello Sonata No. 2 in C Minor; Cello Sonata No. 3 in C Major – Mauro Valli, cello/ Accademia Bizantina/ Ottavio Dantone – ARTS multichannel SACD 47758-8 [Distr. by Albany], 64:11 *****:
Despite the fact that these composers hail from opposite ends of Europe, so to speak, there are some reasons that considering their works in a single review makes sense. First of all, both are far better known as composers for the voice than for instruments. Both were celebrated opera composers who set new standards in that medium for their compatriots and both were equally prized as composers of sacred music.
Another important connection between the composers is the Italian one: both composers were influenced by earlier Italian violinist-composers such as Giovanni Bassani and Arcangelo Corelli, who introduced a new style of playing, and thus writing, for string instruments. In Purcell’s preface to the 1683 edition of his Twelve Sonatas, the composer professed that “he has faithfully endeavour’d to a just imitation of the most fam’d Italian Masters. . . .” Purcell went on to opine that such an attempt would elevate English music, bringing “the seriousness and gravity of that Sort of Musick into vogue, and the reputation among our Countrymen, whose humour, ’tis time now, should begin to loath the levity, and balladry, of our neighbors. . . .”  While he doesn’t make clear who those “neighbors” are, Purcell is apparently thinking of the French, whose music, until the “Italian invasion” of England, was the chief foreign influence. As Matthew Halls explains, “musical tastes at court still leant very much towards the French models, with a particular penchant for ‘theatricall musick’ and the ‘French air in song’. . . .”
Yet as Halls goes on to write, what distinguishes Purcell’s instrumental writing is not a wholesale abandonment of earlier models in favor of Italian ones but a successful fusion of French, Italian, and even native English musical styles, including the consort fantazia style represented by instrumental composers such as John Jenkins and Purcell’s teacher, Matthew Locke. This style is largely responsible for the strained and sometimes dissonant harmonies in Purcell’s Sonatas, but it’s also wise to remember that the fantazia style is the product of an attempt to capture the emotionally-charged vocal writing of the madrigal in instrumental writing. Purcell, like other English composers going back to the Renaissance, wrote both madrigals and vocal music, and this kind of stylistic crossbreeding was a part of Purcell’s DNA; it came naturally, while the imitation of the new Italian instrumental music did not.
The mixture of styles in the Sonatas does make for some fascinating listening. The slow music especially demonstrates that madrigal-like harmonic straining for effect, though some of the slow movements sound as if they could come right of the pages of an Italian sonata da chiesa. The highly contrapuntal faster movements bespeak the influence of Italian virtuosity, but some, like the Presto and the Allegro finale of Sonata II, jig along in a unique style that seems to mate French ballet and English courtly dance.
Maybe you’ll hear something different as you listen to these works. Whatever your reaction, if you’re a lover of Baroque music not familiar with the Sonatas, I think you’ll find them fresh and uniquely satisfying in their inventiveness. This is an hour and more eminently well spent with the great Henry Purcell and friends, namely the Retrospect Trio, who play with style and verve galore. The choice of organ or harpsichord seems to me right on the money: the more somber-hued sonatas sound just right with organ continuo; the chipper Sonata II in B-flat Major and Sonata VI in C Major need the bright pinginess of the harpsichord to make their mark.
Wonderful SACD surround sound from St. George’s Church in Cambridge—apparently not an overly large space, or else the Linn engineers have mastered it because the players are at just the right distance from the microphones so that the sense of presence is not compromised by the resonance of the setting. First-rate in every way.
Purcell’s second set of sonatas, Ten Sonatas in Four Parts, was published two years after the composer’s death in 1695 in an apparent bid to capitalize on the composer’s growing fame. The same is undoubtedly true of Scarlatti’s Concerti Grossi, published in London as Six Concertos in seven parts for two Violins and Violoncello Obligate with two Violins more a Tenor and Thorough Bass in 1740, a full fifteen years after the composer’s death. Scarlatti came late to instrumental music, writing his Six Concerti Grossi sometime between 1708 and 1725, while employed as maestro di cappella at the Cappella Reale in Naples. Like Purcell, Scarlatti could model his concertos on important forerunners by Giuseppe Torelli and Corelli. Yet, as with Purcell, the outcome is more than mere imitation. Scarlatti favors the minor keys—four of the six concerti are in the minor—and that predilection underscores the presumed vocal influences behind the music. The faster movements often have a theatrical sort of drama about them, while slow movements just as often have the kind of heart-rending intensity that shows up in Scarlatti’s sacred works (and, I assume, his operas, though I’m not familiar with them).
Formally, the concerti are mixed indeed. While the separate genres of sonata da chiesa and sonata da camera had begun to merge and/or blur by Scarlatti’s day, he still favors the distinction: Concerto No. 1 is a sonata da chiesa (slow-fast-slow-fast), while the others, with the exception of Concerto No. 2, follow the sonata da camera model (fast-slow-fast-slow-fast). Concerto No. 2 is in the new-fangled concerto form that Vivaldi was establishing (fast-slow-fast). So as with many of the best Baroque composers, Scarlatti’s art represents something old and something new, something borrowed and something—well, I guess we could say that Scarlatti’s tender slow movements are often blue in spirit.
In his three cello concertos (in sonata da chiesa form), Scarlatti again favors minor keys—only the third is in bright C major. Scarlatti is as always attuned to the emotional aspect of music, and the minor-key sonatas are rife with seeming pathos and dramatic tension; the emotions are more wistful in the C Major Sonata. Cellist Mauro Valli and his accompanists (Tiziano Bagnati, lute, and Ottavio Dantone, harpsichord) have made some executive decisions that impact positively on the performances. The inclusion of the archlute in the continuo gives the slow movements an added poignancy, and Valli’s decision to use the lighter, brighter violoncello piccolo (“little cello”) in the C-Major Sonata contributes to the buoyant nature of the piece. The larger version of the cello, with its lower range, is rightly assigned to the darker minor-key sonatas.
All these performances benefit from both informed scholarship and first-rate playing filled with sympathetic regard for the music at hand. The members of Accademia Bizantina really get inside these pieces to provide a compelling musical experience. Again, superb engineering—the Arts Music label seems to specialize in applying SACD recording technique to the benefit of soloists and small ensembles: the Accademia Bizantina fills the listening room with beguiling musical sounds. Heartily recommended!
—Lee Passarella

Related Reviews
Logo Pure Pleasure
Logo Crystal Records Sidebar 300 ms
Logo Jazz Detective Deep Digs Animated 01